Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1101420190510020191
Korean Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science
2019 Volume.51 No. 2 p.191 ~ p.197
Comparison for the Optimal Pressure between Manual CPAP and APAP Titration with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients
Kim Dae-Jin

Choi Byoung-Geol
Cho Jae-Wook
Mun Sue-Jean
Lee Min-Woo
Kim Hyun-Woo
Abstract
Although auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (APAP) titration at home has several advantages over a CPAP titration in terms of convenience and time saving, there are still concerns as to whether it will show corresponding accuracy when compared to laboratory-based polysomnography (PSG) and CPAP titration. To obtain more evidence supporting home-based auto-titration, APAP titration was performed at home for patients who were presented with OSA on laboratory-based diagnostic PSG followed by CPAP titration. A total of 79 patients were included in the study. They all underwent split-night PSG with CPAP titration, and APAP titration for more than 7 days. The patients with successful titration at both situations were selected. The optimal pressure and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of CPAP and APAP titration were compared. The optimal pressure for CPAP and APAP titration were 7.0¡¾1.8 cmH2O and 7.6¡¾1.6 cmH2O (P<0.001), whereas the corresponding AHI were 1.3¡¾1.5/h and 3.0¡¾1.7/h (P<0.001). As a result, the achievement rates of optimal pressure for CPAP and APAP titration were 96.2% and 94.9% (r=-0.045, P=0.688), respectively. The results of this study did not differ with regard to the optimal pressure between CPAP and APAP titration. Overall, CPAP and APAP titrations should be chosen depending on a required situation.
KEYWORD
Apnea-hypopnea index, Auto adjusting positive airway pressure, Continuous positive airway pressure, Hypopnea, Obstructive sleep apnea
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)